CM Conrad Sangma Calls for Dialogue on Proposed Immigration Mechanism, Says Focus Must Be on Curbing Illegal Influx

Shillong: Chief Minister Conrad K. Sangma on Thursday said it would be premature to oppose the state government’s proposal to explore an ILP-like provision under immigration laws without first understanding its contents and mechanism. Responding to questions on preventing illegal influx into Meghalaya, the Chief Minister stressed that the core issue was illegal immigration and not the nomenclature of any particular law or system.

Sangma expressed surprise over objections raised by certain NGOs and opposition parties even before a concrete proposal has been drafted. “Without knowing what exactly is being proposed, opposing it outright simply because the government is suggesting it is not a constructive approach,” he said, urging political parties and civil society groups to engage in meaningful dialogue.

Emphasising that the government is still at an exploratory stage, the Chief Minister said no final decision has been taken. “We are not claiming that whatever we propose will be perfect. We could be missing something. That is why dialogue and consultation are essential,” he added.

He reiterated that the government’s objective is to establish an effective legal and administrative mechanism to check illegal immigration, while ensuring that both the Government of India and local stakeholders are on board. Sangma said political parties and organisations would be invited for discussions once there is clarity on possible options, and consensus would be sought before moving forward.

On the implementation of the Meghalaya Residents Safety and Security Act (MRSSA), Sangma dismissed claims that the law is not being enforced. He said MRSSA is already being implemented in many localities, with a largely positive response, though challenges remain due to infrastructure requirements and the scale of coverage.

The Chief Minister also highlighted structural issues within MRSSA, pointing out inconsistencies between the Act and its Rules, particularly regarding provisions for entry and exit checkpoints. He recalled that earlier attempts to amend the Act to address these gaps could not be carried forward due to objections at the gubernatorial level.

Against this backdrop, Sangma said the government is examining whether provisions under immigration laws could offer an alternative route to empower the state with effective checking mechanisms. “All these aspects require detailed discussion with multiple stakeholders,” he said, reaffirming that the government is open to suggestions and amendments through dialogue